The Global Development And Environment Institute

     

 




Search GDAE

Subscribe for
E-mail Updates

Leontief Prize

Recent Publications

Media Room

Upcoming Events

Publicaciones en Espanol

Publications en Francais

Publications in Chinese

Jobs and Resources

 

Globalization Research

Global Food Crisis
- Revaluing Smallholder Farms
- Beyond Agricultural Subsidies
- Feeding the Factory Farm

- Amazon & Climate Change

Foreign Investment
- Foreign Direct Investment
- Capital Flows
- Treaty Reform

Reforming US Trade Policy
- Lessons from NAFTA
- WTO and Global Trade

- Reforming US FTAs

China & Latin America

Intellectual Property

Working Group on Latin Am.
- Environment
- Foreign Investment
- Agriculture

Globalization Home
- About
- Publications Library
- Researchers

Globalization Media
- Multimedia
- In the News
- Columns & Commentaries
- Gallagher in The Guardian

Read the Triple Crisis Blog

Subscribe for Updates

Follow us on Facebook

Trading Away Stability and Growth: United States Trade Agreements in Latin America

Kevin P. Gallagher
PERI Working Paper No. 266
September 2011
Download the working paper.

Since the early 1990s Latin American nations have been signing trade treaties with the United States that have brought small gains and high costs. Pending deals between the United States and Colombia and the United States and Panama are no different. Each is based on the same template that has been the cornerstone of US trade policy since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). This paper analyzes general equilibrium estimates of the gains from trade from numerous Latin American-US free trade agreements (FTAs) from the 1990s to the present, and juxtaposes such gains with the fiscal and regulatory costs associated with those treaties.

It is clear that these nations are signing deals where the net benefits are ambiguous at best. Indeed, estimates show that the US-Colombia trade treaty pending in the US Congress would yield negative net welfare benefits for Colombia, cost the Colombian government $633 million in tariff revenue, and force Colombia to deregulate its financial and other sectors.

The rest of the paper examines why Latin American nations would sign on to treaties that may not be in their interest. It is shown how many of the treaties signed are a result of asymmetric bargaining power between the US and a Latin American trading partner, a “race” to gain access to the US market before their competitors do, the dominance of right-wing political parties in Latin American countries at the time of negotiation, and a pervasiveness of “neo-liberal” ideas throughout elite decision-making circles throughout the nations that choose to sign treaties with the US.

Download the full working paper, Trading Away Stability and Growth: United States Trade Agreements in Latin America

Read Gallagher's recent post in the Triple Crisis Blog based on this paper: Trading Away Development: The US-Colombia Free Trade Agreement

Learn more about GDAE's work on foreign investment, trade and the lessons from NAFTA.

 

 

 

The Global Development and Environment Institute’s Globalization and Sustainable Development Program examines the economic, social and environmental impacts of economic integration in developing countries, with a particular emphasis on the WTO and NAFTA's lessons for trade and development policy. The goal of the program is to identify policies and international agreements that foster sustainable development.

 

Global Development And Environment Institute
Tufts University
Medford , MA 02155 USA
tel. 617-627-3530 - fax. 617-627-2409 
email: gdae@tufts.edu

 

Copyright © 2002-2008 Tufts University